The Roasting of 1-star Reviewers
Revenge on the 1-star Reviewer
Today I’m feeling inspired by Tinney Heath over at Historical Fiction Research. Tinney has put together a funny put-down of the infamous evil book reviewer.
Readers suffer from misleading, dishonest reviews, and as writers we live beneath the Damocles sword of unfair ratings. A 1-star review delivers a crushing blow to the delicate psyche of writers, yet there are those who revel in dealing this pain. We call them trolls (yes, it’s a technical term).
As long as I’ve been reviewing, I’ve only left one 1-star review. It was well-deserved, I thought, for the appropriation and annihilation of another author’s work–Great Illustrated Classics version of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. But sometimes reviewers post 1-star ratings for the sole purpose of bringing an author down, perhaps in a misguided belief this will elevate his or her own book or the book of a friend. It doesn’t work.
An undeserved rating hurts everyone.
Tinney Heath has challenged writers (hey, you don’t even have to endure icy cold for this one; plus, no buckets needed) to exact a little good-natured revenge in our own writerly way. To that end, satirical or ridiculous verse is encouraged to be savored by readers and writers alike. You can view her post here, a must-read. Head over there and enjoy the many witty offerings!
So…I accepted the challenge and penned a silly limerick:
There once was a one star reviewer
Who lusted for novels to skewer
And his only regret—
He could never beget
A rating of any stars fewer.
Okay, so now I challenge you. Can you add to the sacred volumes of silly verse? You know you want to.
8 thoughts on “The Roasting of 1-star Reviewers”
I can’t think straight for the distraction of the mouth-watering steak.
You made me laugh. A good start to any day!
looks yummy
Ha ha, yes!
Interesting Post! Thanks for sharing ~ I hate the negative reviews as well and appreciate your input.
Unfounded negative reviews are so bad. I don’t mind a well-considered, thoughtful explanation of a reviewer’s issues with a book. More often than not, I find those in the 2-3 star range. I’ve noticed that many 1-star reviews, even legitimate ones, are non-specific, vague, and filled with errors.
I agree – one star reviews are not necessary for any book – if you don’t like it at all then don’t leave a review or at least leave 3 stars or above and write your comments. I don’t believe I have ever left a 1 or 2 star review even when I hated the book (which hasn’t been often anyways). GRILL THEM UP!
Particularly when you leave a 1 star review out of selfish or vindictive motives.